Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany
Impact in
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 796
- Lichen and fungal ecology 475
- Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics 285
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 1.2k
- Top scholars
- Petr PyšekDavid M. RichardsonVojtĕch Jaros̆ı́kFrancesco de BelloZuzana MünzbergováKarel PrachJan PerglBlahoslav Maršálek
- Journals
- Folia Geobotanica (152 papers)Journal of Vegetation Science (121 papers)Annals of Botany (106 papers)PLoS ONE (87 papers)Biological Invasions (83 papers)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaSlovakiaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany
5.0k papers receiving 167.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 231
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 53.6k
- Ecological Modeling 15.4k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 56.5k
- Plant Science 71.1k
- Ecology 45.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany at the time of their publication.
About Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany have published 5.4k papers, which have received a total of 175.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 2.2k papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1.3k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 2.8k papers in Plant Science, 307 papers in Ecological Modeling and 1.0k papers in Ecology on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1.2k papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (988 papers), Plant and animal studies (796 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (538 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (475 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (333 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (307 papers) and Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (285 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (53.6k citations), Ecological Modeling (15.4k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (56.5k citations), Plant Science (71.1k citations) and Ecology (45.7k citations). Authors at Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany collaborate with scholars in Czechia, Slovakia and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Folia Geobotanica, Journal of Vegetation Science, Annals of Botany, PLoS ONE and Biological Invasions. Some of Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany's most productive authors include Petr Pyšek, David M. Richardson, Vojtĕch Jaros̆ı́k, Francesco de Bello, Zuzana Münzbergová, Karel Prach, Jan Pergl, Blahoslav Maršálek, Jan Suda and Jitka Klimešová.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.