Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 0.2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Pollution top 0.2%
- Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 763
- Pollution 2.0k
- Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts 646
- Top scholars
- Dagmar HaaseVolker GrimmCarsten F. DormannThomas R. NeuMatthias LiessJosef SetteleThorsten WiegandNadja Kabisch
- Journals
- The Science of The Total Environment (408 papers)Environmental Science & Technology (386 papers)Water Resources Research (199 papers)PLoS ONE (191 papers)Chemosphere (185 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
14.2k papers receiving 620.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 246
- Ecological Modeling 33.4k
- Pollution 87.5k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 86.5k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 77.1k
- Global and Planetary Change 125.2k
Countries citing scholars working at Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research at the time of their publication.
About Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research have published 15.2k papers, which have received a total of 645.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 763 papers in Ecological Modeling, 2.0k papers in Pollution, 1.9k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 1.5k papers in Environmental Chemistry and 1.9k papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1.4k papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (899 papers), Plant and animal studies (861 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (854 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (763 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (723 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (722 papers) and Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (646 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (33.4k citations), Pollution (87.5k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (86.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (77.1k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (125.2k citations). Authors at Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Science of The Total Environment, Environmental Science & Technology, Water Resources Research, PLoS ONE and Chemosphere. Some of Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research's most productive authors include Dagmar Haase, Volker Grimm, Carsten F. Dormann, Thomas R. Neu, Matthias Liess, Josef Settele, Thorsten Wiegand, Nadja Kabisch, Ingolf Kühn and Hauke Harms.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.