Institute of Economic and Social Development
Impact in
-
- Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
- Development top 10%
Papers in
- Development 41
- Regional Development and Innovation 36
-
- Argentine historical studies 24
- Top scholars
- Elizabeth JelínJaya Prakash PradhanMaria de Nazareth Baudel WanderleyMatthew L. SmithReva I. AllenChristopher G. PetrChien‐Chiang LeeAhmed Tareq Rashid
- Journals
- Revista del Museo de Antropología (9 papers)Antípoda Revista de Antropología y Arqueología (5 papers)Latin American Perspectives (5 papers)Estudos Avançados (4 papers)Education Policy Analysis Archives (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- ArgentinaSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Institute of Economic and Social Development
524 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 196
- Business and International Management 77
- Development 94
- Urban Studies 144
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 191
- Economics and Econometrics 579
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Economic and Social Development
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Economic and Social Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Economic and Social Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Economic and Social Development more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Economic and Social Development
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Economic and Social Development at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Economic and Social Development at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Economic and Social Development
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Economic and Social Development have published 681 papers, which have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 41 papers in Development, 49 papers in Cultural Studies, 43 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 56 papers in Demography and 4 papers in Life-span and Life-course Studies on the topics of Latin American socio-political dynamics (54 papers), Regional Development and Innovation (36 papers), Memory, violence, and history (31 papers), Business, Innovation, and Economy (31 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (29 papers), Indigenous Cultures and History (28 papers), Argentine historical studies (24 papers) and Education in Rural Contexts (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Business and International Management (77 citations), Development (94 citations), Urban Studies (144 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (191 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (579 citations). Authors at Institute of Economic and Social Development collaborate with scholars in Argentina, Spain and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Revista del Museo de Antropología, Antípoda Revista de Antropología y Arqueología, Latin American Perspectives, Estudos Avançados and Education Policy Analysis Archives. Some of Institute of Economic and Social Development's most productive authors include Elizabeth Jelín, Jaya Prakash Pradhan, Maria de Nazareth Baudel Wanderley, Matthew L. Smith, Reva I. Allen, Christopher G. Petr, Chien‐Chiang Lee, Ahmed Tareq Rashid, Lucas A. Garibaldi and Maria Cecília Spina Forjaz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.