Center for the Study of State and Society
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Sperm and Testicular Function
- Ovarian function and disorders
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Sperm and Testicular Function 26
-
- Economic Theory and Policy 39
- Top scholars
- Guillermo O’DonnellVanesa Y. RaweH ChemesRoberto FrenkelMariana RomeroSilvina ArrossiSilvina RamosMartín Rapetti
- Journals
- Fertility and Sterility (14 papers)Human Reproduction (8 papers)Reproductive Health Matters (8 papers)Tobacco Control (8 papers)Education Policy Analysis Archives (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- ArgentinaUnited StatesBrazil
In The Last Decade
Center for the Study of State and Society
496 papers receiving 8.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 211
- Reproductive Medicine 1.7k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.3k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 2.3k
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.4k
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 637
Countries citing scholars working at Center for the Study of State and Society
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Center for the Study of State and Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Center for the Study of State and Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Center for the Study of State and Society more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Center for the Study of State and Society
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Center for the Study of State and Society at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Center for the Study of State and Society at the time of their publication.
About Center for the Study of State and Society
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Center for the Study of State and Society have published 648 papers, which have received a total of 11.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 48 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 42 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, 14 papers in Development, 89 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 34 papers in Finance on the topics of Economic Theory and Policy (39 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (33 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (32 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (30 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (26 papers), Latin American socio-political dynamics (24 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (21 papers) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Reproductive Medicine (1.7k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.3k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (2.3k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.4k citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (637 citations). Authors at Center for the Study of State and Society collaborate with scholars in Argentina, United States and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including Fertility and Sterility, Human Reproduction, Reproductive Health Matters, Tobacco Control and Education Policy Analysis Archives. Some of Center for the Study of State and Society's most productive authors include Guillermo O’Donnell, Vanesa Y. Rawe, H Chemes, Roberto Frenkel, Mariana Romero, Silvina Arrossi, Silvina Ramos, Martín Rapetti, Miguel Ángel Gardetti and Raúl Méjía.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.