Latin American Perspectives

2.1k papers and 15.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Latin American Perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 15.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Latin American Perspectives usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.0k papers), Political Science and International Relations (537 papers) and Cultural Studies (194 papers) specifically the topics of Politics and Society in Latin America (337 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (215 papers) and Social Movements and Political Change in Latin America (151 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Latin American Perspectives are Steve Ellner, Marc Becker, Tamar Diana Wilson, Ronald H. Chilcote, Florence E. Babb, Elizabeth Jelín, Lynn Stephen, Mercedes González de la Rocha, Alex Dupuy and Norma Stoltz Chinchilla.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Latin American Perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Latin American Perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Latin American Perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Latin American Perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Latin American Perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Latin American Perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Latin American Perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025