NHS Digital

15.4k citations
727 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

NHS Digital

492 papers receiving 10.2k citations

Peers

NHS Digital
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Health Informatics 265
  • Health Information Management 587
  • Infectious Diseases 1.2k
  • General Health Professions 1.6k
  • Medical Terminology 14
Replace Wessex Institute of Technology with:
Wessex Institute of Technology United Kingdom
Royal College of General Practitioners United Kingdom
Office for National Statistics United Kingdom
Farr Institute United Kingdom
NHS England United Kingdom
National Health Service Scotland United Kingdom
Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom
NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre United Kingdom
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom
British Medical Association United Kingdom
NHS Digital relative to Wessex Institute of Technology United Kingdom Wessex Institute of Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
Wessex Institute of Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at NHS Digital

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at NHS Digital. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at NHS Digital with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NHS Digital more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at NHS Digital

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with NHS Digital at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with NHS Digital at the time of their publication.

About NHS Digital

In recent decades, authors affiliated with NHS Digital have published 727 papers, which have received a total of 15.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4 papers in Medical Terminology, 45 papers in Health Information Management, 9 papers in Health Informatics, 22 papers in Applied Psychology and 104 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Electronic Health Records Systems (21 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (20 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (19 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (14 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (14 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (13 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (13 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health Informatics (265 citations), Health Information Management (587 citations), Infectious Diseases (1.2k citations), General Health Professions (1.6k citations) and Medical Terminology (14 citations). Authors at NHS Digital collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including BMJ Open, British Journal of Dermatology, Clinical and Experimental Dermatology, Thorax and British Journal of General Practice. Some of NHS Digital's most productive authors include Simon Peck, Bob Young, Jonathan Valabhji, Kamlesh Khunti, Naomi Holman, Peter Knighton, Helen Ford, Naveed Sattar, Steven Crane and Emma Barron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact