British Medical Association

17.7k citations
687 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

British Medical Association

428 papers receiving 12.3k citations

Peers

British Medical Association
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 1.2k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 791
  • Developmental Neuroscience 350
  • General Health Professions 2.0k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 599
Replace Worthing Hospital with:
Worthing Hospital United Kingdom
Watford General Hospital United Kingdom
United BioSource Corporation (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Royal Lancaster Infirmary United Kingdom
West Midlands Deanery United Kingdom
The Patients Association United Kingdom
Civil Service United Kingdom
Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust United Kingdom
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists United Kingdom
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust United Kingdom
British Medical Association relative to Worthing Hospital United Kingdom Worthing Hospital's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Worthing Hospital · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at British Medical Association

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at British Medical Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at British Medical Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Medical Association more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at British Medical Association

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with British Medical Association at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with British Medical Association at the time of their publication.

About British Medical Association

In recent decades, authors affiliated with British Medical Association have published 687 papers, which have received a total of 17.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 3 papers in Medical Terminology, 155 papers in General Health Professions, 104 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 19 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 12 papers in Pharmacy on the topics of Primary Care and Health Outcomes (30 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (29 papers), Ethics in medical practice (27 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (27 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (24 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (21 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (18 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1.2k citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (791 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (350 citations), General Health Professions (2.0k citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (599 citations). Authors at British Medical Association collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Medical Ethics, BMJ, The Medical Journal of Australia, The Lancet and Medical Education. Some of British Medical Association's most productive authors include Robert S. Goodwin, T.M. Savege, Michael A. E. Ramsay, B. R. Simpson, J. G. Scadding, R J Maxwell, Trish Groves, Douglas G. Altman, An‐Wen Chan and Asbjørn Hróbjartsson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact