Royal College of General Practitioners
Impact in
-
- Influenza Virus Research Studies
- Respiratory viral infections research
- Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
- Modeling and Simulation top 10%
- COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Papers in
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 133
- Child and Adolescent Health 60
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 54
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 54
- Top scholars
- Douglas FlemingSimon de LusignanIona HeathAlex James ElliotPaul E. PlsekCarole BuckleyPhilip C HannafordLorcan Kenny
- Journals
- British Journal of General Practice (150 papers)BMJ (42 papers)The Lancet (40 papers)Eurosurveillance (27 papers)BMJ Open (25 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Royal College of General Practitioners
932 papers receiving 23.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
- Epidemiology 7.2k
- Modeling and Simulation 929
- General Health Professions 3.7k
- Family Practice 246
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 3.4k
Countries citing scholars working at Royal College of General Practitioners
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal College of General Practitioners. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal College of General Practitioners with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal College of General Practitioners more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Royal College of General Practitioners
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal College of General Practitioners at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal College of General Practitioners at the time of their publication.
About Royal College of General Practitioners
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal College of General Practitioners have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 30.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 313 papers in General Health Professions, 219 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 36 papers in Health Information Management, 245 papers in Epidemiology and 49 papers in Emergency Medical Services on the topics of Primary Care and Health Outcomes (133 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (126 papers), Respiratory viral infections research (72 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (60 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (54 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (54 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (45 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (40 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Epidemiology (7.2k citations), Modeling and Simulation (929 citations), General Health Professions (3.7k citations), Family Practice (246 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (3.4k citations). Authors at Royal College of General Practitioners collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including British Journal of General Practice, BMJ, The Lancet, Eurosurveillance and BMJ Open. Some of Royal College of General Practitioners's most productive authors include Douglas Fleming, Simon de Lusignan, Iona Heath, Alex James Elliot, Paul E. Plsek, Carole Buckley, Philip C Hannaford, Lorcan Kenny, Elizabeth Pellicano and D M Fleming.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.