Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne
Impact in
-
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 16
- Top scholars
- Terry ShinnGianluca ManzoPierre-Marie ChauvinJeremy Keith WardFranck VarenneBernward JoergesNathalie BulleRaymond Boudon
- Journals
- Scientometrics (4 papers)Quantitative Science Studies (4 papers)Revue Française de Sociologie (27 papers)L Année sociologique (27 papers)Mind & Society (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne
341 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
- Health 442
- History and Philosophy of Science 200
- Sociology and Political Science 1.6k
- Management of Technology and Innovation 239
- Urban Studies 179
Countries citing scholars working at Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne at the time of their publication.
About Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne have published 439 papers, which have received a total of 4.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 35 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 10 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 38 papers in Urban Studies, 229 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 54 papers in Political Science and International Relations on the topics of French Urban and Social Studies (62 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (57 papers), Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender (31 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (28 papers), Social Policies and Family (24 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (17 papers), Emile Durkheim and Sociology (16 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (16 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (442 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (200 citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.6k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (239 citations) and Urban Studies (179 citations). Authors at Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne collaborate with scholars in France, Switzerland and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Scientometrics, Quantitative Science Studies, Revue Française de Sociologie, L Année sociologique and Mind & Society. Some of Groupe d'Étude des Méthodes de l'Analyse Sociologique de la Sorbonne's most productive authors include Terry Shinn, Gianluca Manzo, Pierre-Marie Chauvin, Jeremy Keith Ward, Franck Varenne, Bernward Joerges, Nathalie Bulle, Raymond Boudon, Christian Bessy and Béate Collet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.