Oxford Centre for Mission Studies

12.4k citations
553 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Oxford Centre for Mission Studies

444 papers receiving 11.2k citations

Peers

Oxford Centre for Mission Studies
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Management Information Systems 1.3k
  • Accounting 924
  • Public Administration 295
  • Development 310
  • Strategy and Management 952
Replace The University of Law with:
The University of Law United Kingdom
Groupement de Recherche et d'Études en Gestion d’HEC France
Centre for European Policy Studies Belgium
CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord France
Local Government Association United Kingdom
Amsterdam University College Netherlands
Institut d'Économie Industrielle France
German University of Administrative Sciences Germany
Hague Institute for Global Justice Netherlands
Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Belgium
Oxford Centre for Mission Studies relative to The University of Law United Kingdom The University of Law's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.6×
The University of Law · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Oxford Centre for Mission Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Oxford Centre for Mission Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Oxford Centre for Mission Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oxford Centre for Mission Studies more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Oxford Centre for Mission Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Oxford Centre for Mission Studies at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Oxford Centre for Mission Studies at the time of their publication.

About Oxford Centre for Mission Studies

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Oxford Centre for Mission Studies have published 553 papers, which have received a total of 12.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 82 papers in Religious studies, 170 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 13 papers in Development, 35 papers in Philosophy and 25 papers in Accounting on the topics of Religion, Society, and Development (60 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (45 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (31 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (18 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (18 papers), Islamic Studies and History (16 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (15 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (14 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Management Information Systems (1.3k citations), Accounting (924 citations), Public Administration (295 citations), Development (310 citations) and Strategy and Management (952 citations). Authors at Oxford Centre for Mission Studies collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Transformation An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies, Journal of Eastern African Studies, Biochemistry, Journal of African Cultural Studies and International Review of Mission. Some of Oxford Centre for Mission Studies's most productive authors include Nigel Slack, Haitham Nobanee, Augustin Kwasi Fosu, Anthony G. Hopwood, Janine Nahapiet, Colin D. B. Clubb, Richard D. Whitley, Paul Collier, Jan Willem Gunning and Christopher M. Dobson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact