Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha

405 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha
Comparison fields: 5 of 197
  • Orthodontics 150
  • General Dentistry 46
  • Periodontics 102
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 77
  • Oral Surgery 113
Replace Entomological Society of Brazil with:
Entomological Society of Brazil Brazil
Universidade do Planalto Catarinense Brazil
Anhanguera (Brazil) Brazil
Centro Universitário de Lavras Brazil
Centro de Estudos em Psicologia da Saúde Brazil
Microsoft (Brazil) Brazil
Fundação Armando Alvares Penteado Brazil
Hospital São Vicente Brazil
Centro Universitário Anhanguera Brazil
Faculdade Evangélica do Paraná Brazil
Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha relative to Entomological Society of Brazil Brazil Entomological Society of Brazil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Entomological Society of Brazil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha at the time of their publication.

About Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha have published 587 papers, which have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 56 papers in Information Systems and Management, 23 papers in Health Information Management, 18 papers in Orthodontics, 30 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 14 papers in Occupational Therapy on the topics of Business and Management Studies (56 papers), Academic Research in Diverse Fields (39 papers), Sports injuries and prevention (23 papers), Healthcare Regulation (23 papers), Sports Performance and Training (21 papers), Physical Education and Gymnastics (21 papers), Brazilian Legal Issues (20 papers) and Education Pedagogy and Practices (18 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Orthodontics (150 citations), General Dentistry (46 citations), Periodontics (102 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (77 citations) and Oral Surgery (113 citations). Authors at Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, Ciência Agronômica/Revista ciência agronômica, Physical Therapy in Sport, Brazilian Oral Research and Jornal de Pediatria. Some of Faculdade da Serra Gaúcha's most productive authors include Teresa Padró, Lina Badimón, Gemma Vilahur, Cleber Cremonese, Rafael Teixeira, Vinicius Antonio Machado Nardi, Caroline Pietá Dias, Carmen Freire, Camila Piccoli and Fernando de Oliveira Santini.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact