Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos

5.3k citations
740 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos

564 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 506
  • Strategy and Management 734
  • Forestry 177
  • Animal Science and Zoology 393
  • Aquatic Science 257
Replace Universidade Santa Úrsula with:
Universidade Santa Úrsula Brazil
Universidade Candido Mendes Brazil
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation Brazil
Faculdade de Agudos Brazil
Associação Paulista para o Desenvolvimento da Medicina Brazil
Bank of Brazil Brazil
Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento Brazil
Governo do Estado de São Paulo Brazil
Universidade do Contestado Brazil
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais Brazil
Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos relative to Universidade Santa Úrsula Brazil Universidade Santa Úrsula's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Universidade Santa Úrsula · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos at the time of their publication.

About Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos have published 740 papers, which have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 72 papers in Information Systems and Management, 29 papers in Forestry, 26 papers in Urban Studies, 40 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 46 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Business and Management Studies (70 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (33 papers), Academic Research in Diverse Fields (28 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (27 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (26 papers), Education and Digital Technologies (24 papers), Education Pedagogy and Practices (23 papers) and Urban Development and Societal Issues (20 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Agronomy and Crop Science (506 citations), Strategy and Management (734 citations), Forestry (177 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (393 citations) and Aquatic Science (257 citations). Authors at Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, Neotropical Ichthyology, PERIÓDICO TCHÊ QUÍMICA and Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. Some of Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos's most productive authors include Felipe Arias Fogliano de Souza Cunha, Leonardo Marques, Rosane K. Gertner, Carl Huish Christensen, Ângela da Rocha, Erick Meira, Renato J. Orsato, Belita Koiller, Liliane Lodi and Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact