National Education and Research Network

4.7k citations
525 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

National Education and Research Network

379 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

National Education and Research Network
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Infectious Diseases 472
  • Ecological Modeling 84
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 18
  • Global and Planetary Change 350
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 7
Replace Microsoft (Brazil) with:
Microsoft (Brazil) Brazil
Instituto de Tecnologia do Paraná Brazil
Instituto de Biologia do Exército Brazil
Bio-Bras Brazil
Universidade Santa Úrsula Brazil
Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation Brazil
Hospital Universitário - Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Brazil
Fundação de Estudos e Pesquisas Aquáticas Brazil
Academia da Força Aérea Brazil
Centro Universitário de Itajubá Brazil
National Education and Research Network relative to Microsoft (Brazil) Brazil Microsoft (Brazil)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Microsoft (Brazil) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at National Education and Research Network

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Education and Research Network. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Education and Research Network with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Education and Research Network more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at National Education and Research Network

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Education and Research Network at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Education and Research Network at the time of their publication.

About National Education and Research Network

In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Education and Research Network have published 525 papers, which have received a total of 4.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 27 papers in Information Systems and Management, 80 papers in Education, 44 papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 2 papers in General Arts and Humanities and 29 papers in Infectious Diseases on the topics of Education Pedagogy and Practices (43 papers), Education and Digital Technologies (33 papers), Science and Education Research (22 papers), Software-Defined Networks and 5G (21 papers), Business and Management Studies (20 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (20 papers), Linguistics and Education Research (14 papers) and Academic Research in Diverse Fields (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Infectious Diseases (472 citations), Ecological Modeling (84 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (18 citations), Global and Planetary Change (350 citations) and Nuclear Energy and Engineering (7 citations). Authors at National Education and Research Network collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Grid Computing and Frontiers in Microbiology. Some of National Education and Research Network's most productive authors include Philip M. Fearnside, Giliane de Souza Trindade, F.A.M. Echevarria, Mariza Almeida, Afrânio Lineu Kritski, Kim L. Bennell, Fiona Dobson, Simon French, Rana S. Hinman and Philippa Nicolson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact