Fundação João Pinheiro

365 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Fundação João Pinheiro
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
  • Biological Psychiatry 67
  • Information Systems and Management 170
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 162
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 181
  • General Health Professions 272
Replace Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos with:
Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos Brazil
Centro Universitário do Distrito Federal Brazil
Universidade do Vale do Sapucaí Brazil
Brazilian Academy of Sciences Brazil
Universidade Candido Mendes Brazil
Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva Brazil
Centro Latino-Americano e do Caribe de Informação em Ciências da Saúde Brazil
Faculdade Evangélica do Paraná Brazil
Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal Brazil
Centro Universitário Barão de Mauá Brazil
Fundação João Pinheiro relative to Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos Brazil Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Centro Universitário Serra dos Órgãos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fundação João Pinheiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fundação João Pinheiro. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fundação João Pinheiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fundação João Pinheiro more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fundação João Pinheiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fundação João Pinheiro at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fundação João Pinheiro at the time of their publication.

About Fundação João Pinheiro

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fundação João Pinheiro have published 526 papers, which have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 71 papers in Information Systems and Management, 48 papers in Urban Studies, 55 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 95 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 13 papers in Forestry on the topics of Business and Management Studies (70 papers), Education and Public Policy (58 papers), Urban Development and Societal Issues (44 papers), Rural Development and Agriculture (42 papers), Social and Economic Solidarity (34 papers), Social and Political Issues (28 papers), Academic Research in Diverse Fields (26 papers) and Brazilian Legal Issues (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (67 citations), Information Systems and Management (170 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (162 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (181 citations) and General Health Professions (272 citations). Authors at Fundação João Pinheiro collaborate with scholars in Brazil, United States and Portugal and have published in prestigious journals including Revista de Saúde Pública, Dados, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Future Internet and Cadernos de Pesquisa. Some of Fundação João Pinheiro's most productive authors include Joseph Fabiano Guimarães Santos, Líliam Barbosa Silva, Sônia Maria Soares, Patrícia Aparecida Barbosa Silva, Mirela Castro Santos Camargos, Moisés Evandro Bauer, Lucas Adriano Pereira, Fernando Augusto Proietti, Rodrigo Barreto Huguet and Antônio Lúcio Teixeira.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact