Neotropical Ichthyology

1.4k papers and 20.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Neotropical Ichthyology in the last decades have received a total of 20.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Neotropical Ichthyology usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.3k papers), Aquatic Science (1.1k papers) and Ecology (155 papers) specifically the topics of Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (1.1k papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (1.1k papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (676 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neotropical Ichthyology are Juan Marcos Mirande, Ângelo Antônio Agostinho, Alexandre C. Ribeiro, Luiz Roberto Malabarba, Cláudia Bueno dos Reis Martinez, Vinicius de Araújo Bertaco, Carla Simone Pavanelli, José Luís Olivan Birindelli, Lílian Casatti and Jansen Zuanon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Neotropical Ichthyology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Neotropical Ichthyology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neotropical Ichthyology.

Countries where authors publish in Neotropical Ichthyology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neotropical Ichthyology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neotropical Ichthyology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neotropical Ichthyology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025