University of Applied Sciences Potsdam

1.3k papers receiving 19.3k citations

Peers

University of Applied Sciences Potsdam
Comparison fields: 5 of 243
  • Human-Computer Interaction 824
  • Health Informatics 159
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.4k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 809
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.7k
Replace Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences with:
Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences Germany
University College Copenhagen Denmark
Fachhochschule Salzburg Austria
Technische Hochschule Mannheim Germany
Heidelberg University of Education Germany
Hochschule Osnabrück Germany
Saxion Netherlands
Trier University of Applied Sciences Germany
Amsterdam University of the Arts Netherlands
Hochschule Bremen Germany
University of Applied Sciences Potsdam relative to Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences Germany Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Applied Sciences Potsdam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Applied Sciences Potsdam. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Applied Sciences Potsdam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Applied Sciences Potsdam more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Applied Sciences Potsdam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Applied Sciences Potsdam at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Applied Sciences Potsdam at the time of their publication.

About University of Applied Sciences Potsdam

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Applied Sciences Potsdam have published 1.7k papers, which have received a total of 22.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 16 papers in Health Informatics, 64 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 73 papers in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, 28 papers in Museology and 175 papers in Organic Chemistry on the topics of Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (46 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (38 papers), Synthesis and Characterization of Heterocyclic Compounds (37 papers), Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry (37 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (37 papers), Sports Performance and Training (35 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (34 papers) and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (29 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Human-Computer Interaction (824 citations), Health Informatics (159 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.4k citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (809 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (1.7k citations). Authors at University of Applied Sciences Potsdam collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Scientific Reports, Analytica Chimica Acta, Geophysical Research Letters, Archiv der Pharmazie and Frontiers in Psychology. Some of University of Applied Sciences Potsdam's most productive authors include Wolfgang Lucht, Jürgen P. Kropp, Luís Costa, Prajal Pradhan, Diego Rybski, Heinz Gehlen, Ralf Engbert, Urs Granacher, Reto Wettach and Claudia Stolle.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact