University of Applied Sciences St Pölten
Impact in
-
- Magnetic Properties of Alloys
-
- Data Visualization and Analytics
Papers in
-
- Data Visualization and Analytics 80
- Top scholars
- T. SchreflMatthias ZeppelzauerSimon TjoaPeter KiesebergAndreas HolzingerEdgar R. WeipplWolfgang Aigner ABrian Horsak
- Journals
- Gait & Posture (29 papers)Journal of Applied Physics (23 papers)Applied Physics Letters (17 papers)Computer Graphics Forum (13 papers)Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
University of Applied Sciences St Pölten
710 papers receiving 10.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.6k
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.4k
- Artificial Intelligence 1.4k
- Information Systems 958
- Health Informatics 87
Countries citing scholars working at University of Applied Sciences St Pölten
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Applied Sciences St Pölten. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Applied Sciences St Pölten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Applied Sciences St Pölten more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of Applied Sciences St Pölten
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Applied Sciences St Pölten at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Applied Sciences St Pölten at the time of their publication.
About University of Applied Sciences St Pölten
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Applied Sciences St Pölten have published 823 papers, which have received a total of 10.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 150 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 31 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 23 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 92 papers in Information Systems and 15 papers in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design on the topics of Data Visualization and Analytics (80 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (47 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (36 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (25 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (25 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (23 papers), Gait Recognition and Analysis (22 papers) and Information and Cyber Security (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.6k citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.4k citations), Artificial Intelligence (1.4k citations), Information Systems (958 citations) and Health Informatics (87 citations). Authors at University of Applied Sciences St Pölten collaborate with scholars in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Gait & Posture, Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters, Computer Graphics Forum and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. Some of University of Applied Sciences St Pölten's most productive authors include T. Schrefl, Matthias Zeppelzauer, Simon Tjoa, Peter Kieseberg, Andreas Holzinger, Edgar R. Weippl, Wolfgang Aigner A, Brian Horsak, A Min Tjoa and Sepehri Amin Hossein.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.