Windesheim University of Applied Sciences
Impact in
-
- Teaching and Learning Programming
- Research and Theory top 5%
Papers in
-
- Physical Education and Pedagogy 28
- Top scholars
- Joke M. VoogtMargreet van der CingelSusan E. McKenneySui Lin GoeiPeter NikkenTommy L.S. VisscherMarcel HeerinkNiek Pot
- Journals
- Teaching and Teacher Education (15 papers)PLoS ONE (13 papers)BMC Public Health (12 papers)Obesity Facts (9 papers)Journalism (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Windesheim University of Applied Sciences
783 papers receiving 18k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
- Computer Science Applications 1.1k
- Research and Theory 446
- Leadership and Management 213
- Education 4.3k
- Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 680
Countries citing scholars working at Windesheim University of Applied Sciences
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Windesheim University of Applied Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Windesheim University of Applied Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Windesheim University of Applied Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Windesheim University of Applied Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Windesheim University of Applied Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Windesheim University of Applied Sciences at the time of their publication.
About Windesheim University of Applied Sciences
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Windesheim University of Applied Sciences have published 865 papers, which have received a total of 18k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 9 papers in Life-span and Life-course Studies, 38 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 216 papers in Education, 83 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 95 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (64 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (35 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (34 papers), Physical Education and Pedagogy (28 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (25 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (25 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (24 papers) and Social Robot Interaction and HRI (21 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Computer Science Applications (1.1k citations), Research and Theory (446 citations), Leadership and Management (213 citations), Education (4.3k citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (680 citations). Authors at Windesheim University of Applied Sciences collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Teaching and Teacher Education, PLoS ONE, BMC Public Health, Obesity Facts and Journalism. Some of Windesheim University of Applied Sciences's most productive authors include Joke M. Voogt, Margreet van der Cingel, Susan E. McKenney, Sui Lin Goei, Peter Nikken, Tommy L.S. Visscher, Marcel Heerink, Niek Pot, John van der Kamp and Anneke Smits.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.