Evidence Based Research (United States)
Impact in
-
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Papers in
-
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation 13
-
- Health Sciences Research and Education 46
- Health Policy Implementation Science 22
- Top scholars
- Ronald J. FeiseEllen Fineout‐OverholtRobert L KaneBernadette Mazurek MelnykCheryl B. StetlerKelly KoernerSusan B. StillwellMartin R. Tramèr
- Journals
- BMJ Open (19 papers)Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing (6 papers)Medicine (6 papers)Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice (6 papers)Archives of Disease in Childhood (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
Evidence Based Research (United States)
536 papers receiving 13.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 420
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 548
- General Health Professions 2.6k
- Health Informatics 142
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 306
Countries citing scholars working at Evidence Based Research (United States)
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Evidence Based Research (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Evidence Based Research (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence Based Research (United States) more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Evidence Based Research (United States)
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Evidence Based Research (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Evidence Based Research (United States) at the time of their publication.
About Evidence Based Research (United States)
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Evidence Based Research (United States) have published 736 papers, which have received a total of 19.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 15 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 110 papers in General Health Professions, 27 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 10 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 5 papers in Family Practice on the topics of Health Sciences Research and Education (46 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (27 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (23 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (22 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (13 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (13 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (11 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Issues, ethics and legal aspects (420 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (548 citations), General Health Professions (2.6k citations), Health Informatics (142 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (306 citations). Authors at Evidence Based Research (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and China and have published in prestigious journals including BMJ Open, Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, Medicine, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice and Archives of Disease in Childhood. Some of Evidence Based Research (United States)'s most productive authors include Ronald J. Feise, Ellen Fineout‐Overholt, Robert L Kane, Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk, Cheryl B. Stetler, Kelly Koerner, Susan B. Stillwell, Martin R. Tramèr, Nadia Elia and Kathleen M. Williamson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.