American Nurses Association
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Nursing education and management
-
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Papers in
-
- Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership 47
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation 43
-
- Nursing education and management 42
- Top scholars
- Mark R. RaymondDavid M CadizDonald M. TruxilloMary Curry NarayanCarol J. BickfordSusan WilburnCheryl PetersonAudrey Nelson
- Journals
- JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (36 papers)Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing (36 papers)Nursing Research (29 papers)Clinical Nurse Specialist (25 papers)Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing (21 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBrazil
In The Last Decade
American Nurses Association
719 papers receiving 9.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
- Research and Theory 583
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 544
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 597
- General Health Professions 2.9k
- Emergency Medical Services 731
Countries citing scholars working at American Nurses Association
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Nurses Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Nurses Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Nurses Association more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at American Nurses Association
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Nurses Association at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Nurses Association at the time of their publication.
About American Nurses Association
In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Nurses Association have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 12.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 87 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects, 42 papers in Research and Theory, 92 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 48 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and 219 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (47 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (43 papers), Nursing education and management (42 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (32 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (32 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (30 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (29 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Research and Theory (583 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (544 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (597 citations), General Health Professions (2.9k citations) and Emergency Medical Services (731 citations). Authors at American Nurses Association collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil and have published in prestigious journals including JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, Nursing Research, Clinical Nurse Specialist and Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing. Some of American Nurses Association's most productive authors include Mark R. Raymond, David M Cadiz, Donald M. Truxillo, Mary Curry Narayan, Carol J. Bickford, Susan Wilburn, Cheryl Peterson, Audrey Nelson, Leslie B. Hammer and Nola J. Pender.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.