Dublin City University

485.3k citations
21.5k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Dublin City University

19.0k papers receiving 446.6k citations

Peers

Dublin City University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Bioengineering 15.1k
  • Research and Theory 1.4k
  • Electrochemistry 10.4k
  • Biomedical Engineering 60.5k
  • Information Systems 26.1k
Replace University College Cork with:
University College Cork Ireland
Swansea University United Kingdom
University of Limerick Ireland
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway Ireland
University of Salford United Kingdom
University of Bath United Kingdom
Loughborough University United Kingdom
Lancaster University United Kingdom
University of Surrey United Kingdom
University of Hull United Kingdom
Dublin City University relative to University College Cork Ireland University College Cork's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
University College Cork · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Dublin City University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Dublin City University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Dublin City University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dublin City University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Dublin City University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Dublin City University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Dublin City University at the time of their publication.

About Dublin City University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Dublin City University have published 21.5k papers, which have received a total of 485.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 542 papers in Bioengineering, 1.4k papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2.1k papers in Artificial Intelligence, 1.4k papers in Information Systems and 314 papers in Computer Science Applications on the topics of Topic Modeling (767 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (751 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (542 papers), Optical Network Technologies (434 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (346 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (342 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (339 papers) and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (311 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Bioengineering (15.1k citations), Research and Theory (1.4k citations), Electrochemistry (10.4k citations), Biomedical Engineering (60.5k citations) and Information Systems (26.1k citations). Authors at Dublin City University collaborate with scholars in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Materials Processing Technology, PLoS ONE, The Analyst, Analytica Chimica Acta and Sensors and Actuators B Chemical. Some of Dublin City University's most productive authors include Dermot Diamond, Alan F. Smeaton, A.G. Olabi, M.S.J. Hashmi, Brian M. Lucey, Richard O’Kennedy, Shaen Corbet, Malcolm R. Smyth, Gabriel‐Miro Muntean and Robert J. Forster.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact