Dublin City University

495.7k citations
21.1k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Dublin City University

18.7k papers receiving 451.2k citations

Peers

Dublin City University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Bioengineering 15.1k
  • Research and Theory 1.5k
  • Electrochemistry 10.4k
  • Biomedical Engineering 60.4k
  • Information Systems 26.0k
Replace Trinity College Dublin with:
Trinity College Dublin Ireland
University College Cork Ireland
University of Limerick Ireland
University of Salford United Kingdom
University of Bath United Kingdom
University of Warwick United Kingdom
Lancaster University United Kingdom
University of Surrey United Kingdom
University of Strathclyde United Kingdom
Keele University United Kingdom
Dublin City University relative to Trinity College Dublin Ireland Trinity College Dublin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Trinity College Dublin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Dublin City University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Dublin City University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Dublin City University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dublin City University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Dublin City University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Dublin City University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Dublin City University at the time of their publication.

About Dublin City University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Dublin City University have published 21.1k papers, which have received a total of 495.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 539 papers in Bioengineering, 1.4k papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2.2k papers in Artificial Intelligence, 1.3k papers in Information Systems and 322 papers in Computer Science Applications on the topics of Topic Modeling (785 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (767 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (539 papers), Optical Network Technologies (438 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (345 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (343 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (338 papers) and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (315 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Bioengineering (15.1k citations), Research and Theory (1.5k citations), Electrochemistry (10.4k citations), Biomedical Engineering (60.4k citations) and Information Systems (26.0k citations). Authors at Dublin City University collaborate with scholars in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Materials Processing Technology, PLoS ONE, Analytica Chimica Acta, The Analyst and Sensors and Actuators B Chemical. Some of Dublin City University's most productive authors include Dermot Diamond, Alan F. Smeaton, Abdul Ghani Olabi, M.S.J. Hashmi, Richard J O’Kennedy, Brian M. Lucey, Malcolm R. Smyth, Gabriel‐Miro Muntean, Shaen Corbet and Robert J. Forster.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact