Trinity College Dublin

2.1M citations
59.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Trinity College Dublin

52.5k papers receiving 1.9M citations

Peers

Trinity College Dublin
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Biological Psychiatry 16.0k
  • Immunology 124.4k
  • Materials Chemistry 246.7k
  • Neurology 38.2k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 83.2k
Replace University of Glasgow with:
University of Glasgow United Kingdom
Cardiff University United Kingdom
University of Liverpool United Kingdom
University of Bristol United Kingdom
University of Birmingham United Kingdom
University of Leeds United Kingdom
University of Southampton United Kingdom
University of Nottingham United Kingdom
University of Sheffield United Kingdom
University College Dublin Ireland
Trinity College Dublin relative to University of Glasgow United Kingdom University of Glasgow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
University of Glasgow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Trinity College Dublin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Trinity College Dublin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Trinity College Dublin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trinity College Dublin more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Trinity College Dublin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Trinity College Dublin at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Trinity College Dublin at the time of their publication.

About Trinity College Dublin

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Trinity College Dublin have published 59.9k papers, which have received a total of 2.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 382 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 2.2k papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 1.5k papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 1.9k papers in Immunology and 1.7k papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials on the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (613 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (589 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (582 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (543 papers), Graphene research and applications (537 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (490 papers), Irish and British Studies (458 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (447 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biological Psychiatry (16.0k citations), Immunology (124.4k citations), Materials Chemistry (246.7k citations), Neurology (38.2k citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (83.2k citations). Authors at Trinity College Dublin collaborate with scholars in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Journal of Applied Physics, Physical Review B and Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. Some of Trinity College Dublin's most productive authors include Luke A.J. O'Neill, J. M. D. Coey, Jonathan N. Coleman, Fergal J. O’Brien, Paul M. Sharp, Kenneth H. Wolfe, Kingston H. G. Mills, Stefano Sanvito, Mike J Clarke and Marina A. Lynch.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact