University of Strathclyde
Impact in
- Pharmaceutical Science top 0.5%
Papers in
- Ocean Engineering 1.5k
- Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability 566
-
- HVDC Systems and Fault Protection 382
- Top scholars
- Xuerong MaoStephen Mark BarnettRichard G. BrooksDavid C. SherringtonDesmond John HighamRichard B. RosePeter G. WatermanDavid Nicol
- Journals
- Ocean Engineering (533 papers)Physical Review A (283 papers)British Journal of Pharmacology (261 papers)Applied Physics Letters (243 papers)Scientific Reports (242 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
University of Strathclyde
56.1k papers receiving 1.6M citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
- Pharmaceutical Science 19.6k
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 6.2k
- Biomaterials 32k
- Management of Technology and Innovation 21.8k
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 3k
Countries citing scholars working at University of Strathclyde
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Strathclyde. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Strathclyde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Strathclyde more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at University of Strathclyde
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Strathclyde at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Strathclyde at the time of their publication.
About University of Strathclyde
In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Strathclyde have published 58.9k papers, which have received a total of 1.6M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Ocean Engineering, 5.7k papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 235 papers in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2.3k papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 110 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management on the topics of Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (644 papers), Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability (566 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (528 papers), Wind Energy Research and Development (464 papers), High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena (454 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (454 papers), Coordination Chemistry and Organometallics (412 papers) and HVDC Systems and Fault Protection (382 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Science (19.6k citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (6.2k citations), Biomaterials (32k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (21.8k citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (3k citations). Authors at University of Strathclyde collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Ocean Engineering, Physical Review A, British Journal of Pharmacology, Applied Physics Letters and Scientific Reports. Some of University of Strathclyde's most productive authors include Xuerong Mao, Stephen Mark Barnett, Richard G. Brooks, David C. Sherrington, Desmond John Higham, Richard B. Rose, Peter G. Waterman, David Nicol, Colin Eden and Tom G. Baum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.