University of Warwick

71.9k papers receiving 2.4M citations

Peers

University of Warwick
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 74.0k
  • Strategy and Management 102.1k
  • Public Administration 23.0k
  • General Decision Sciences 9.9k
  • Management Information Systems 48.1k
Replace University of Nottingham with:
University of Nottingham United Kingdom
University of Manchester United Kingdom
University of Sheffield United Kingdom
Cardiff University United Kingdom
University of Oxford United Kingdom
University of Leeds United Kingdom
University of Birmingham United Kingdom
University College London United Kingdom
Lancaster University United Kingdom
University of Cambridge United Kingdom
University of Warwick relative to University of Nottingham United Kingdom University of Nottingham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
University of Nottingham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Warwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Warwick. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Warwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Warwick more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Warwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Warwick at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Warwick at the time of their publication.

About University of Warwick

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Warwick have published 82.2k papers, which have received a total of 2.7M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 868 papers in Public Administration, 420 papers in General Decision Sciences, 2.1k papers in Mathematical Physics, 732 papers in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and 1.8k papers in Geometry and Topology on the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (1.6k papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (781 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (763 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (710 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (708 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (686 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (684 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (673 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (74.0k citations), Strategy and Management (102.1k citations), Public Administration (23.0k citations), General Decision Sciences (9.9k citations) and Management Information Systems (48.1k citations). Authors at University of Warwick collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Germany and have published in prestigious journals including Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, PLoS ONE, Astronomy and Astrophysics, BMJ Open and Scientific Reports. Some of University of Warwick's most productive authors include Margaret Scotford Archer, R. John Ellis, Andrew Pettigrew, Peter John Sadler, Andrew J. Oswald, Patrick R. Unwin, John Mingers, Dieter Wolke, David Phillip Woodruff and Edmund T. Rolls.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact