Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
-
- Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Papers in
-
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 29
- Top scholars
- Jakub ŠrolVladimíra ČavojováEva Ballová MikuškováPeter DrotárRichard FilčákVladimı́r BalážPeter HaľamaAttila Antal
In The Last Decade
Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
216 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- General Decision Sciences 233
- Sociology and Political Science 667
- Clinical Psychology 269
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 154
- Health 94
Countries citing scholars working at Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences at the time of their publication.
About Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences have published 254 papers, which have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 29 papers in General Decision Sciences, 6 papers in Family Practice, 22 papers in Demography, 76 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 26 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Misinformation and Its Impacts (30 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (29 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (13 papers), Romani and Gypsy Studies (10 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (8 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (7 papers) and Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (7 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (233 citations), Sociology and Political Science (667 citations), Clinical Psychology (269 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (154 citations) and Health (94 citations). Authors at Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences collaborate with scholars in Slovakia, Czechia and Finland and have published in prestigious journals including Personality and Individual Differences, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Frontiers in Psychology, Moravian Geographical Reports and Thinking & Reasoning. Some of Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences of the Slovak Academy of Sciences's most productive authors include Jakub Šrol, Vladimíra Čavojová, Eva Ballová Mikušková, Peter Drotár, Richard Filčák, Vladimı́r Baláž, Peter Haľama, Attila Antal, Edyta Łaszkiewicz and Yaryna Khmara.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.