United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
Impact in
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- Fractional Differential Equations Solutions
Papers in
- Toxicology 17
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 17
- Top scholars
- H. J. HauboldA. M. MathaiPaul E. BellairR. K. SaxenaMichael MassogliaPayam AkhavanGilberto GerraAlex P. Schmid
- Journals
- International Journal of Drug Policy (15 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (9 papers)Space Policy (7 papers)Criminology (6 papers)Criminology & Public Policy (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
333 papers receiving 8.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
- Modeling and Simulation 1.1k
- Toxicology 295
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 414
- Numerical Analysis 382
- Health 432
Countries citing scholars working at United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime at the time of their publication.
About United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime have published 425 papers, which have received a total of 9.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 17 papers in Toxicology, 18 papers in Modeling and Simulation, 47 papers in Clinical Psychology, 26 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 90 papers in Sociology and Political Science on the topics of HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (34 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (29 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (28 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (26 papers), Space exploration and regulation (22 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (20 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (18 papers) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (17 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Modeling and Simulation (1.1k citations), Toxicology (295 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (414 citations), Numerical Analysis (382 citations) and Health (432 citations). Authors at United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime collaborate with scholars in Austria, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Drug Policy, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Space Policy, Criminology and Criminology & Public Policy. Some of United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime's most productive authors include H. J. Haubold, A. M. Mathai, Paul E. Bellair, R. K. Saxena, Michael Massoglia, Payam Akhavan, Gilberto Gerra, Alex P. Schmid, Omer R. Galle and Mark C. Stafford.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.