Moravian Geographical Reports

271 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 271 papers published in Moravian Geographical Reports in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Moravian Geographical Reports usually cover Sociology and Political Science (67 papers), Global and Planetary Change (63 papers) and Urban Studies (57 papers) specifically the topics of Land Use and Ecosystem Services (43 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (42 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Moravian Geographical Reports are Bohumil Frantál, Michal Lehnert, Jan Geletič, Pavel Klapka, Eva Nováková, Marián Halás, Robert Osman, Josef Kunc, Dan van der Horst and Stanislav Martinát.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Moravian Geographical Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Moravian Geographical Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Moravian Geographical Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Moravian Geographical Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Moravian Geographical Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Moravian Geographical Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Moravian Geographical Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025