Institute for Social Research
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Health disparities and outcomes
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Papers in
- Health 38
- Health disparities and outcomes 13
-
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 32
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance 18
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 13
- Top scholars
- Scott H. DeckerJenn‐Yun TeinLinda Young‐DeMarcoArland ThorntonDavid P. MacKinnonAaron B. TaylorKatarina PrpićDavid C. Pyrooz
- Journals
- Scientometrics (14 papers)International Journal of Sociology (6 papers)IDS Bulletin (6 papers)Justice Quarterly (5 papers)Social Forces (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- CroatiaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Institute for Social Research
446 papers receiving 10.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
- Health 1.2k
- Sociology and Political Science 5.7k
- Demography 1.1k
- Clinical Psychology 1.8k
- Social Psychology 1.8k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Social Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Social Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Social Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Social Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Social Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Social Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Social Research at the time of their publication.
About Institute for Social Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Social Research have published 603 papers, which have received a total of 12.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 38 papers in Health, 199 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 56 papers in Clinical Psychology, 55 papers in Social Psychology and 60 papers in General Health Professions on the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (32 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (18 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (14 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (13 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (13 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (13 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (1.2k citations), Sociology and Political Science (5.7k citations), Demography (1.1k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.8k citations) and Social Psychology (1.8k citations). Authors at Institute for Social Research collaborate with scholars in Croatia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Scientometrics, International Journal of Sociology, IDS Bulletin, Justice Quarterly and Social Forces. Some of Institute for Social Research's most productive authors include Scott H. Decker, Jenn‐Yun Tein, Linda Young‐DeMarco, Arland Thornton, Scott H. Decker, David P. MacKinnon, Aaron B. Taylor, Katarina Prpić, David C. Pyrooz and Jane Allyn Piliavin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.