Institute for Social Research
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Health disparities and outcomes
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
Papers in
- Health 33
-
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 32
- Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance 18
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 14
- Religion and Society Interactions 12
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 12
- Top scholars
- Scott H. DeckerJenn‐Yun TeinDavid P. MacKinnonAaron B. TaylorKatarina PrpićDavid C. PyroozDorwin CartwrightC. Michael Barton
- Journals
- Scientometrics (14 papers)International Journal of Sociology (6 papers)Social Forces (5 papers)Justice Quarterly (5 papers)Traditiones (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CroatiaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Institute for Social Research
369 papers receiving 8.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 187
- Health 881
- Sociology and Political Science 4.5k
- Clinical Psychology 1.6k
- Social Psychology 1.4k
- General Health Professions 1.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute for Social Research
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute for Social Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute for Social Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute for Social Research more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute for Social Research
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute for Social Research at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute for Social Research at the time of their publication.
About Institute for Social Research
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute for Social Research have published 505 papers, which have received a total of 9.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 33 papers in Health, 177 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 19 papers in Communication, 15 papers in Urban Studies and 47 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Crime Patterns and Interventions (32 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (18 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (14 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (13 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (13 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (12 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (12 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (881 citations), Sociology and Political Science (4.5k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.6k citations), Social Psychology (1.4k citations) and General Health Professions (1.1k citations). Authors at Institute for Social Research collaborate with scholars in Croatia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Scientometrics, International Journal of Sociology, Social Forces, Justice Quarterly and Traditiones. Some of Institute for Social Research's most productive authors include Scott H. Decker, Jenn‐Yun Tein, Scott H. Decker, David P. MacKinnon, Aaron B. Taylor, Katarina Prpić, David C. Pyrooz, Dorwin Cartwright, C. Michael Barton and Axel Honneth.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.