Concordia University

41.8k papers receiving 1.1M citations

Peers

Concordia University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 56.4k
  • Marketing 41.2k
  • Social Psychology 90.7k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 12.7k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49.0k
Replace University of Massachusetts Amherst with:
University of Massachusetts Amherst United States
Queen's University Canada
Dartmouth College United States
Université Laval Canada
Northeastern University United States
University of Connecticut United States
University at Albany, State University of New York United States
Université du Québec à Montréal Canada
Syracuse University United States
Carleton University Canada
Concordia University relative to University of Massachusetts Amherst United States University of Massachusetts Amherst's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
University of Massachusetts Amherst · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Concordia University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Concordia University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Concordia University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Concordia University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Concordia University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Concordia University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Concordia University at the time of their publication.

About Concordia University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Concordia University have published 46.5k papers, which have received a total of 1.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.3k papers in Computer Networks and Communications, 699 papers in Software, 3.5k papers in Control and Systems Engineering, 1.6k papers in Signal Processing and 1.9k papers in Building and Construction on the topics of Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (825 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (714 papers), Microwave Engineering and Waveguides (679 papers), Software Engineering Research (671 papers), Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems (608 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (573 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (562 papers) and Multilevel Inverters and Converters (536 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (56.4k citations), Marketing (41.2k citations), Social Psychology (90.7k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (12.7k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49.0k citations). Authors at Concordia University collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Building and Environment, IEEE Access, Energy and Buildings, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications and IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation. Some of Concordia University's most productive authors include Rex B. Kline, Roy A. Wise, Corinna Marie Elliott, Nassim Tabri, Blake E. Ashforth, Jane Stewart, Fariborz Haghighat, Gary Johns, Marylène Gagné and Youmin Zhang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact