Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas

52.9k citations
3.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas

3.0k papers receiving 51.1k citations

Peers

Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • Food Science 6.1k
  • Insect Science 3.4k
  • Plant Science 10.3k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.0k
  • Paleontology 1.8k
Replace Universidade Federal do Pampa with:
Universidade Federal do Pampa Brazil
Centro Científico Tecnológico - La Plata Argentina
Universidad Nacional del Litoral Argentina
Universidad de Montevideo Uruguay
Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires Argentina
National Institute of Industrial Technology Argentina
Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto Argentina
National University of Mar del Plata Argentina
Centro Científico Tecnológico - Bahía Blanca Argentina
National University of San Luis Argentina
Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas relative to Universidade Federal do Pampa Brazil Universidade Federal do Pampa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Universidade Federal do Pampa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas at the time of their publication.

About Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas have published 3.3k papers, which have received a total of 52.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 247 papers in Insect Science, 207 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 109 papers in Paleontology, 544 papers in Plant Science and 259 papers in Food Science on the topics of Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (115 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (92 papers), Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (88 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (82 papers), Plant and animal studies (79 papers), Marine and fisheries research (76 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (70 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (69 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Food Science (6.1k citations), Insect Science (3.4k citations), Plant Science (10.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.0k citations) and Paleontology (1.8k citations). Authors at Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas collaborate with scholars in Argentina, Spain and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of South American Earth Sciences, Journal of Food Engineering, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Journal of Food Science and LWT. Some of Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas's most productive authors include Silvia Liliana Resnik, A. Plastino, Constantino Tsallis, Guillermo Hough, A. Somoza, Juán Alberto Galantini, Sergio A. Giner, Fermı́n C. Iturriza, Nancy Quaranta and Raúl Eduardo Rivas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact