Fisheries and Oceans Canada

549.7k citations
15.3k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Fisheries and Oceans Canada

14.6k papers receiving 540.2k citations

Peers

Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Comparison fields: 5 of 240
  • Oceanography 137.0k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 118.7k
  • Aquatic Science 60.0k
  • Ecology 208.2k
  • Global and Planetary Change 165.3k
Replace NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service with:
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service United States
Environment and Climate Change Canada Canada
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration United States
Marine Biological Laboratory United States
Environmental Protection Agency United States
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution United States
United States Fish and Wildlife Service United States
United States Department of Agriculture United States
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science United States
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada
Fisheries and Oceans Canada relative to NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service United States NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Fisheries and Oceans Canada. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Fisheries and Oceans Canada with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fisheries and Oceans Canada more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Fisheries and Oceans Canada

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Fisheries and Oceans Canada at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Fisheries and Oceans Canada at the time of their publication.

About Fisheries and Oceans Canada

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Fisheries and Oceans Canada have published 15.3k papers, which have received a total of 549.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 4.4k papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 3.9k papers in Oceanography, 5.5k papers in Global and Planetary Change, 6.2k papers in Ecology and 1.7k papers in Aquatic Science on the topics of Fish Ecology and Management Studies (4.1k papers), Marine and fisheries research (3.8k papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (1.7k papers), Marine animal studies overview (1.6k papers), Marine and coastal ecosystems (1.4k papers), Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics (1.2k papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (1.1k papers) and Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (1.1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Oceanography (137.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (118.7k citations), Aquatic Science (60.0k citations), Ecology (208.2k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (165.3k citations). Authors at Fisheries and Oceans Canada collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including ICES Journal of Marine Science, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Marine Ecology Progress Series, Aquaculture and Journal of Fish Biology. Some of Fisheries and Oceans Canada's most productive authors include Robie W. Macdonald, Robert H. Devlin, Derek C. G. Muir, Eddy C. Carmack, Robert E. Hecky, Michael G. Ikonomou, Daniel Caissie, Edward M. Donaldson, Jake Rice and Gregg T. Tomy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact