ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 166
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 196
- Top scholars
- Hugh P. PossinghamKerrie A. WilsonDavid B. LindenmayerJames WatsonNibedita MukherjeeChristina DerrickTobias Ochieng NyumbaJonathan R. Rhodes
- Journals
- Biological Conservation (52 papers)Conservation Biology (47 papers)PLoS ONE (42 papers)Conservation Letters (30 papers)Diversity and Distributions (26 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
661 papers receiving 39.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 227
- Ecological Modeling 7.5k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 10.1k
- Global and Planetary Change 16.9k
- Ecology 19.2k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 5.4k
Countries citing scholars working at ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions at the time of their publication.
About ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions
In recent decades, authors affiliated with ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions have published 673 papers, which have received a total of 41.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 166 papers in Ecological Modeling, 248 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 324 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 351 papers in Ecology and 82 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (196 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (169 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (166 papers), Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (100 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (93 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (93 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (71 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (61 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (7.5k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (10.1k citations), Global and Planetary Change (16.9k citations), Ecology (19.2k citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (5.4k citations). Authors at ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Conservation, Conservation Biology, PLoS ONE, Conservation Letters and Diversity and Distributions. Some of ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions's most productive authors include Hugh P. Possingham, Kerrie A. Wilson, David B. Lindenmayer, James Watson, Nibedita Mukherjee, Christina Derrick, Tobias Ochieng Nyumba, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Clive McAlpine and Moreno Di Marco.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.