Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network

26.5k citations
760 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network

662 papers receiving 25.7k citations

Peers

Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Ecological Modeling 2.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.9k
  • Soil Science 3.0k
  • Global and Planetary Change 6.6k
  • Ecology 7.7k
Replace Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy with:
Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy Australia
NSW Forestry Corporation Australia
ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions Australia
Cotton Research and Development Corporation Australia
National Parks and Wildlife Service Australia
Sydney Water Australia
Reef Ecologic Australia
WaterNSW Australia
Sugar Research Australia (Australia) Australia
Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Australia
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network relative to Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy Australia Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Queensland Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network at the time of their publication.

About Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network have published 760 papers, which have received a total of 26.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 109 papers in Ecological Modeling, 193 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 267 papers in Ecology, 222 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 72 papers in Soil Science on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (144 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (109 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (88 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (85 papers), Plant and animal studies (63 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (59 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (37 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (34 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (2.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.9k citations), Soil Science (3.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (6.6k citations) and Ecology (7.7k citations). Authors at Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network collaborate with scholars in Australia, Switzerland and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Austral Ecology, PLoS ONE, Global Change Biology, Ecology and Evolution and New Phytologist. Some of Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network's most productive authors include M. V. Brian, Roya Kelishadi, Rainer Schulin, Nazanin Abbaspour, Andreas Richter, Lian Pin Koh, Jaboury Ghazoul, Richard F. Hurrell, Robert L. Sinsabaugh and Daryl Moorhead.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact