Australian National Wildlife Collection
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 85
- Ecology 242
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 113
- Avian ecology and behavior 55
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 39
- Top scholars
- Leo JosephJanet L. GardnerDavid B. LindenmayerChris MargulesDaniel B. BotkinKen AplinRobert HeinsohnMichael Kearney
- Journals
- Emu - Austral Ornithology (66 papers)Zootaxa (31 papers)Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (18 papers)Molecular Ecology (16 papers)PLoS ONE (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Australian National Wildlife Collection
481 papers receiving 16.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 203
- Ecological Modeling 2.3k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.5k
- Ecology 6.8k
- Paleontology 1.7k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4.1k
Countries citing scholars working at Australian National Wildlife Collection
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Australian National Wildlife Collection. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Australian National Wildlife Collection with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian National Wildlife Collection more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Australian National Wildlife Collection
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Australian National Wildlife Collection at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Australian National Wildlife Collection at the time of their publication.
About Australian National Wildlife Collection
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Australian National Wildlife Collection have published 524 papers, which have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 85 papers in Ecological Modeling, 242 papers in Ecology, 211 papers in Genetics, 92 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 49 papers in Paleontology on the topics of Genetic diversity and population structure (140 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (113 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (85 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (55 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (49 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (48 papers), Plant and animal studies (41 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (2.3k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.5k citations), Ecology (6.8k citations), Paleontology (1.7k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (4.1k citations). Authors at Australian National Wildlife Collection collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Emu - Austral Ornithology, Zootaxa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, Molecular Ecology and PLoS ONE. Some of Australian National Wildlife Collection's most productive authors include Leo Joseph, Janet L. Gardner, David B. Lindenmayer, Chris Margules, Daniel B. Botkin, Ken Aplin, Robert Heinsohn, Michael Kearney, R. Mykytowycz and David M. Spratt.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.