National Parks and Wildlife Service
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 145
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 196
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies 45
- Top scholars
- Robert L. PresseyChris R. MargulesRichard T. KingsfordSimon FerrierJennie PearceDavid A. KeithRichard M. CowlingRoss A. Bradstock
- Journals
- Biological Conservation (59 papers)Emu - Austral Ornithology (48 papers)Austral Ecology (31 papers)Conservation Biology (24 papers)Wildlife Research (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
National Parks and Wildlife Service
786 papers receiving 40.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 195
- Ecological Modeling 10.1k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 17.8k
- Ecology 20.8k
- Global and Planetary Change 13.3k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 6.3k
Countries citing scholars working at National Parks and Wildlife Service
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at National Parks and Wildlife Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at National Parks and Wildlife Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Parks and Wildlife Service more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at National Parks and Wildlife Service
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with National Parks and Wildlife Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with National Parks and Wildlife Service at the time of their publication.
About National Parks and Wildlife Service
In recent decades, authors affiliated with National Parks and Wildlife Service have published 830 papers, which have received a total of 40.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 145 papers in Ecological Modeling, 281 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 484 papers in Ecology, 184 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 136 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (282 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (196 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (145 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (98 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (77 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (66 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (50 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (45 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (10.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (17.8k citations), Ecology (20.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (13.3k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (6.3k citations). Authors at National Parks and Wildlife Service collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Biological Conservation, Emu - Austral Ornithology, Austral Ecology, Conservation Biology and Wildlife Research. Some of National Parks and Wildlife Service's most productive authors include Robert L. Pressey, Chris R. Margules, Richard T. Kingsford, Simon Ferrier, Jennie Pearce, Simon Ferrier, David A. Keith, Richard M. Cowling, Ross A. Bradstock and Tony D. Auld.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.