CSIRO Scientific Computing

59.9k citations
529 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

CSIRO Scientific Computing

496 papers receiving 58.1k citations

Peers

CSIRO Scientific Computing
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Ecological Modeling 6.0k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 14.7k
  • Global and Planetary Change 21.2k
  • Ecology 20.4k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 8.9k
Replace National Parks and Wildlife Service with:
National Parks and Wildlife Service Australia
Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Australia
ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions Australia
Natural Hazards Research Australia Australia
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network Australia
Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences Australia
Bush Heritage Australia Australia
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia
Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria Australia
Melbourne Water Australia
CSIRO Scientific Computing relative to National Parks and Wildlife Service Australia National Parks and Wildlife Service's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
National Parks and Wildlife Service · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at CSIRO Scientific Computing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at CSIRO Scientific Computing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at CSIRO Scientific Computing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CSIRO Scientific Computing more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at CSIRO Scientific Computing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with CSIRO Scientific Computing at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with CSIRO Scientific Computing at the time of their publication.

About CSIRO Scientific Computing

In recent decades, authors affiliated with CSIRO Scientific Computing have published 529 papers, which have received a total of 59.9k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 157 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 43 papers in Forestry, 41 papers in Ecological Modeling, 215 papers in Ecology and 131 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (129 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (104 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (68 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (48 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (41 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (37 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (35 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (27 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (6.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (14.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (21.2k citations), Ecology (20.4k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (8.9k citations). Authors at CSIRO Scientific Computing collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Wildlife Research, Austral Ecology, Journal of Applied Ecology, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment and Ecological Economics. Some of CSIRO Scientific Computing's most productive authors include Julian R. W. Reid, Stephen R. Carpenter, Brian Walker, Carl Folke, Mike P. Austin, Marten Scheffer, Michael P. Austin, Jonathan A. Foley, Brian Robert Walker and Xuemei Bai.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact