CSIRO Scientific Computing

54.0k citations
485 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

CSIRO Scientific Computing

457 papers receiving 52.7k citations

Peers

CSIRO Scientific Computing
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
  • Ecological Modeling 5.6k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 13.7k
  • Global and Planetary Change 19.1k
  • Ecology 18.8k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 8.1k
Replace NSW Environment and Heritage with:
NSW Environment and Heritage Australia
ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions Australia
Australian National Wildlife Collection Australia
Bush Heritage Australia Australia
Murray Darling Basin Authority Australia
Melbourne Water Australia
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Australia
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Australia
State Herbarium of South Australia Australia
Collaboration for Australian Weather and Climate Research Australia
CSIRO Scientific Computing relative to NSW Environment and Heritage Australia NSW Environment and Heritage's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
NSW Environment and Heritage · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at CSIRO Scientific Computing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at CSIRO Scientific Computing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at CSIRO Scientific Computing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CSIRO Scientific Computing more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at CSIRO Scientific Computing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with CSIRO Scientific Computing at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with CSIRO Scientific Computing at the time of their publication.

About CSIRO Scientific Computing

In recent decades, authors affiliated with CSIRO Scientific Computing have published 485 papers, which have received a total of 54.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 142 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 38 papers in Forestry, 37 papers in Ecological Modeling, 192 papers in Ecology and 120 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (117 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (93 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (59 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (41 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (37 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (32 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (25 papers) and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (25 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (5.6k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (13.7k citations), Global and Planetary Change (19.1k citations), Ecology (18.8k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (8.1k citations). Authors at CSIRO Scientific Computing collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Wildlife Research, Journal of Applied Ecology, Austral Ecology, Ecological Economics and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. Some of CSIRO Scientific Computing's most productive authors include Julian Reid, Stephen R. Carpenter, Mike P. Austin, Carl Folke, M. P. Austin, Marten Scheffer, Brian Walker, Jonathan A. Foley, Brian R. Walker and Xuemei Bai.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact