Erasmus University Rotterdam

66.4k papers receiving 2.9M citations

Peers

Erasmus University Rotterdam
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 145.0k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 199.6k
  • Strategy and Management 137.4k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 66.1k
  • Business and International Management 17.5k
Replace University of Groningen with:
University of Groningen Netherlands
Maastricht University Netherlands
Radboud University Nijmegen Netherlands
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Netherlands
University of Nottingham United Kingdom
Universität Hamburg Germany
Ghent University Belgium
King's College London United Kingdom
Newcastle University United Kingdom
University of Southampton United Kingdom
Erasmus University Rotterdam relative to University of Groningen Netherlands University of Groningen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
University of Groningen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Erasmus University Rotterdam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Erasmus University Rotterdam. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Erasmus University Rotterdam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erasmus University Rotterdam more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Erasmus University Rotterdam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam at the time of their publication.

About Erasmus University Rotterdam

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam have published 77.9k papers, which have received a total of 3.4M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 487 papers in General Decision Sciences, 4.9k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 5.5k papers in Economics and Econometrics, 1.9k papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 7.4k papers in Surgery on the topics of Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (1.7k papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1.4k papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (1.3k papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (804 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (773 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (728 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (653 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (647 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (145.0k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (199.6k citations), Strategy and Management (137.4k citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (66.1k citations) and Business and International Management (17.5k citations). Authors at Erasmus University Rotterdam collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, European Heart Journal, European Journal of Cancer, The Lancet and The American Journal of Cardiology. Some of Erasmus University Rotterdam's most productive authors include Arnold B. Bakker, Evangelia Demerouti, Ewout Willem Steyerberg, Jan H.J. Hoeijmakers, Patrick W. Serruys, Ruut Veenhoven, Daan van Knippenberg, Albert Hofman, Ludo Waltman and Nees Jan van Eck.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact