British Trust for Ornithology

66.8k citations
1.4k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

British Trust for Ornithology

1.3k papers receiving 64.1k citations

Peers

British Trust for Ornithology
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
  • Ecological Modeling 18.7k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 25.6k
  • Ecology 43.6k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 16.6k
  • Global and Planetary Change 14.6k
Replace Royal Society for the Protection of Birds with:
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds United Kingdom
Ecologie, Société, Evolution France
Conservation Leadership Programme United Kingdom
Ecologie & Evolution France
Centre d'Écologie et des Sciences de la Conservation France
Structure et Instabilité des Génomes France
Research Institute for Nature and Forest Belgium
Ecosystèmes, Biodiversité, Evolution France
Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage France
Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé France
British Trust for Ornithology relative to Royal Society for the Protection of Birds United Kingdom Royal Society for the Protection of Birds's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at British Trust for Ornithology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at British Trust for Ornithology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at British Trust for Ornithology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Trust for Ornithology more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at British Trust for Ornithology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with British Trust for Ornithology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with British Trust for Ornithology at the time of their publication.

About British Trust for Ornithology

In recent decades, authors affiliated with British Trust for Ornithology have published 1.4k papers, which have received a total of 66.8k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 397 papers in Ecological Modeling, 528 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 1.0k papers in Ecology, 104 papers in Parasitology and 28 papers in Developmental Biology on the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (730 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (563 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (422 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (397 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (131 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (111 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (101 papers) and Plant and animal studies (98 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (18.7k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (25.6k citations), Ecology (43.6k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (16.6k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (14.6k citations). Authors at British Trust for Ornithology collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands and have published in prestigious journals including Bird Study, Ibis, Journal of Applied Ecology, Biological Conservation and Journal of Animal Ecology. Some of British Trust for Ornithology's most productive authors include Robert J. Fuller, Humphrey Q. P. Crick, Jeremy J. D. Greenwood, Stephen R. Baillie, Robert A. Robinson, Jeremy D. Wilson, Juliet A. Vickery, William J. Sutherland, Richard D. Gregory and Dan Chamberlain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact