Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage
1.2k papers
receiving
40.8k citations
Peers
Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage
Comparison fields: 5 of 207
Ecology26.7k
Ecological Modeling4.0k
Nature and Landscape Conservation7.2k
Small Animals4.1k
Parasitology2.5k
Replace Genoscope with:
GenoscopeFrance
Game & Wildlife Conservation TrustUnited Kingdom
Conservation Leadership ProgrammeUnited Kingdom
Tour du ValatFrance
Fera Science (United Kingdom)United Kingdom
Centre d'Écologie et des Sciences de la ConservationFrance
Wildfowl & Wetlands TrustUnited Kingdom
International Union for Conservation of NatureSwitzerland
Biomathematics and Statistics ScotlandUnited Kingdom
British Trust for OrnithologyUnited Kingdom
Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvagerelative toGenoscopeFranceGenoscope's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.1×
Genoscope · 1×
×1.027k/28kECOLO
×3.64k/1kEM
×3.17k/2kNLC
×7.14k/580SA
×1.02k/2kPARAS
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries citing scholars working at Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage at the time of their publication.
About Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage have published 1.3k papers, which have received a total of 41.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 829 papers in Ecology, 115 papers in Ecological Modeling, 223 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 120 papers in Small Animals and 91 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (583 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (232 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (166 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (140 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (122 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (121 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (115 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (97 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecology (26.7k citations), Ecological Modeling (4.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (7.2k citations), Small Animals (4.1k citations) and Parasitology (2.5k citations). Authors at Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Wildlife Biology, European Journal of Wildlife Research, PLoS ONE, Canadian Journal of Zoology and Biological Conservation. Some of Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage's most productive authors include Jean‐Michel Gaillard, Anne Loison, Marco Festa-Bianchet, Carole Toïgo, Michel Pascal, Matthieu Guillemain, François Klein, Sonia Saı̈d, Philippe Clergeau and Clément Calenge.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact