Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 0.5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 392
- Ecology 1.5k
- Avian ecology and behavior 933
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 784
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 226
- Marine animal studies overview 126
- Top scholars
- Rhys E. GreenPaul F. DonaldJeremy D. WilsonAndrew BalmfordRichard D. GregoryRichard B. BradburyJuliet A. VickeryBrendan Fisher
- Journals
- Ibis (196 papers)Bird Study (177 papers)Biological Conservation (136 papers)Journal of Applied Ecology (84 papers)Bird Conservation International (79 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
1.9k papers receiving 99.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
- Ecological Modeling 21.0k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 30.9k
- Ecology 57.6k
- Global and Planetary Change 25.5k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 20.6k
Countries citing scholars working at Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Royal Society for the Protection of Birds. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Royal Society for the Protection of Birds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Royal Society for the Protection of Birds more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Royal Society for the Protection of Birds at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Royal Society for the Protection of Birds at the time of their publication.
About Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Royal Society for the Protection of Birds have published 2.0k papers, which have received a total of 102.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 392 papers in Ecological Modeling, 1.5k papers in Ecology, 658 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 147 papers in Parasitology and 43 papers in Developmental Biology on the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (933 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (784 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (463 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (392 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (226 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (152 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (145 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (126 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (21.0k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (30.9k citations), Ecology (57.6k citations), Global and Planetary Change (25.5k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (20.6k citations). Authors at Royal Society for the Protection of Birds collaborate with scholars in United Kingdom, United States and South Africa and have published in prestigious journals including Ibis, Bird Study, Biological Conservation, Journal of Applied Ecology and Bird Conservation International. Some of Royal Society for the Protection of Birds's most productive authors include Rhys E. Green, Paul F. Donald, Jeremy D. Wilson, Andrew Balmford, Richard D. Gregory, Richard B. Bradbury, Juliet A. Vickery, Brendan Fisher, R. E. Green and Jeff Ollerton.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.