Bowling Green State University

492.6k citations
16.6k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Bowling Green State University

15.6k papers receiving 491.1k citations

Peers

Bowling Green State University
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Health 30.9k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 25.9k
  • Social Psychology 33.8k
  • Clinical Psychology 30k
  • Demography 15.3k
Replace Kent State University with:
Kent State University United States
University of Notre Dame United States
Ohio University United States
Miami University United States
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee United States
University of Toledo United States
University of Illinois System United States
York University Canada
Northern Illinois University United States
University of North Carolina at Greensboro United States
Bowling Green State University relative to Kent State University United States Kent State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Kent State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Bowling Green State University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Bowling Green State University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Bowling Green State University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bowling Green State University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Bowling Green State University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Bowling Green State University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Bowling Green State University at the time of their publication.

About Bowling Green State University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Bowling Green State University have published 16.6k papers, which have received a total of 492.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 529 papers in Health, 627 papers in Statistics and Probability, 134 papers in General Decision Sciences, 442 papers in Demography and 832 papers in Social Psychology on the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (349 papers), Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (326 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (317 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (311 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (218 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (215 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (199 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (182 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (30.9k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (25.9k citations), Social Psychology (33.8k citations), Clinical Psychology (30k citations) and Demography (15.3k citations). Authors at Bowling Green State University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Marriage and the Family, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Journal of Paleontology and The Journal of Popular Culture. Some of Bowling Green State University's most productive authors include Jaak Panksepp, Kenneth I. Pargäment, Dwayne D. Gremler, Felix N. Castellano, Peggy C. Giordano, Wendy D. Manning, Susan L. Brown, Hokey Min, Neocles B. Leontis and Kevin P. Gwinner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact