Bowling Green State University

494.3k citations
17.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Bowling Green State University

14.8k papers receiving 452.9k citations

Peers

Bowling Green State University
Comparison fields: 5 of 251
  • Health 36.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 36.3k
  • Social Psychology 66.7k
  • Clinical Psychology 56.4k
  • Gender Studies 24.9k
Replace Kent State University with:
Kent State University United States
University of Notre Dame United States
Ohio University United States
Miami University United States
Michigan United United States
Loyola University Chicago United States
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee United States
York University Canada
University of Toledo United States
Northern Illinois University United States
Bowling Green State University relative to Kent State University United States Kent State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Kent State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Bowling Green State University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Bowling Green State University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Bowling Green State University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bowling Green State University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Bowling Green State University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Bowling Green State University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Bowling Green State University at the time of their publication.

About Bowling Green State University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Bowling Green State University have published 17.2k papers, which have received a total of 494.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 697 papers in Health, 830 papers in Gender Studies, 698 papers in Statistics and Probability, 1.6k papers in Social Psychology and 1.4k papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (365 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (317 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (256 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (250 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (247 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (246 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (244 papers) and Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (226 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Health (36.2k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (36.3k citations), Social Psychology (66.7k citations), Clinical Psychology (56.4k citations) and Gender Studies (24.9k citations). Authors at Bowling Green State University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Marriage and the Family, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Journal of Paleontology and The Journal of Popular Culture. Some of Bowling Green State University's most productive authors include Jaak Panksepp, Kenneth I. Pargäment, Dwayne D. Gremler, Peggy C. Giordano, Felix N. Castellano, Wendy D. Manning, Susan L. Brown, Sherry E. Sullivan, Neocles B. Leontis and Kevin P. Gwinner.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact