Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Papers in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 39
- Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies 15
-
- Coastal and Marine Management 25
- Top scholars
- Aletta BonnHorst KornJutta StadlerNadja KabischStefan NehringMathias OttoJeff ArdronSonja Knapp
- Journals
- Environmental Sciences Europe (19 papers)ZooKeys (11 papers)Nature Conservation (8 papers)Journal of Ethnopharmacology (8 papers)Ecological Indicators (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
354 papers receiving 10.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.2k
- Global and Planetary Change 2.3k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 1.4k
- Environmental Engineering 828
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 805
Countries citing scholars working at Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Agency for Nature Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Agency for Nature Conservation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Agency for Nature Conservation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Agency for Nature Conservation at the time of their publication.
About Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Agency for Nature Conservation have published 377 papers, which have received a total of 10.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 76 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 57 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 68 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 8 papers in Ecological Modeling and 95 papers in Plant Science on the topics of Genetically Modified Organisms Research (67 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (39 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (25 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (21 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers), Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies (15 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (15 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (13 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (2.3k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (1.4k citations), Environmental Engineering (828 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (805 citations). Authors at Federal Agency for Nature Conservation collaborate with scholars in Germany, Austria and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Sciences Europe, ZooKeys, Nature Conservation, Journal of Ethnopharmacology and Ecological Indicators. Some of Federal Agency for Nature Conservation's most productive authors include Aletta Bonn, Horst Korn, Jutta Stadler, Nadja Kabisch, Stefan Nehring, Mathias Otto, Jeff Ardron, Sonja Knapp, Wolfram Reichenbecher and Dagmar Haase.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.