Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Marine and fisheries research
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 45
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 47
- Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies 29
- Top scholars
- Horst KornJutta StadlerNadja KabischAletta BonnMonica Pacheco-FabigNian LiStefan NehringJeff Ardron
- Journals
- Environmental Sciences Europe (19 papers)Ecological Indicators (10 papers)The Science of The Total Environment (9 papers)Biodiversity and Conservation (9 papers)Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustriaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
454 papers receiving 12.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
- Global and Planetary Change 4.2k
- Ecological Modeling 741
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.0k
- Ecology 3.7k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 1.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Federal Agency for Nature Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federal Agency for Nature Conservation more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Federal Agency for Nature Conservation at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Federal Agency for Nature Conservation at the time of their publication.
About Federal Agency for Nature Conservation
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Federal Agency for Nature Conservation have published 513 papers, which have received a total of 13.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 45 papers in Ecological Modeling, 100 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 152 papers in Ecology, 67 papers in Insect Science and 118 papers in Global and Planetary Change on the topics of Genetically Modified Organisms Research (55 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (47 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (45 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (37 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (31 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (31 papers), Plant and animal studies (30 papers) and Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies (29 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (4.2k citations), Ecological Modeling (741 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.0k citations), Ecology (3.7k citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (1.7k citations). Authors at Federal Agency for Nature Conservation collaborate with scholars in Germany, Austria and Switzerland and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Sciences Europe, Ecological Indicators, The Science of The Total Environment, Biodiversity and Conservation and Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science. Some of Federal Agency for Nature Conservation's most productive authors include Horst Korn, Jutta Stadler, Nadja Kabisch, Aletta Bonn, Monica Pacheco-Fabig, Nian Li, Stefan Nehring, Jeff Ardron, Mathias Otto and Sonja Knapp.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.