Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Ecology top 10%
- Avian ecology and behavior
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 85
- Ecology 241
- Avian ecology and behavior 170
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 82
- Top scholars
- Ruud FoppenChris A. M. van TurnhoutBruno J. EnsHenk P. van der JeugdA. van StrienHans SchekkermanEelke JongejansCaspar A. Hallmann
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (13 papers)Ardea (11 papers)Ibis (11 papers)Animal Behaviour (9 papers)Journal of Applied Ecology (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology
370 papers receiving 14.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
- Ecological Modeling 3.7k
- Ecology 8.4k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 3.4k
- Developmental Biology 335
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.0k
Countries citing scholars working at Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology at the time of their publication.
About Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology have published 418 papers, which have received a total of 14.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 85 papers in Ecological Modeling, 241 papers in Ecology, 87 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 11 papers in Developmental Biology and 25 papers in Parasitology on the topics of Avian ecology and behavior (170 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (85 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (82 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (65 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (53 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (25 papers), Marine and fisheries research (23 papers) and Plant and animal studies (22 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Ecological Modeling (3.7k citations), Ecology (8.4k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (3.4k citations), Developmental Biology (335 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (3.0k citations). Authors at Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Ardea, Ibis, Animal Behaviour and Journal of Applied Ecology. Some of Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology's most productive authors include Ruud Foppen, Chris A. M. van Turnhout, Bruno J. Ens, Henk P. van der Jeugd, A. van Strien, Hans Schekkerman, Eelke Jongejans, Caspar A. Hallmann, Hans de Kroon and Theunis Piersma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.