Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid

34.6k citations
596 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid

577 papers receiving 33.7k citations

Peers

Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Environmental Chemistry 9.7k
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 7.8k
  • Pollution 6.1k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 6.2k
  • Ecology 11.6k
Replace Fahrenheit (Germany) with:
Fahrenheit (Germany) Germany
WRc (United Kingdom) United Kingdom
Sands United Kingdom
Federal Office for the Environment Switzerland
Lowestoft Hospital United Kingdom
Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity Germany
European Environment Agency Denmark
Hochschule Bremerhaven Germany
Institut Océanographique France
Environmental Protection Agency Denmark
Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid relative to Fahrenheit (Germany) Germany Fahrenheit (Germany)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Fahrenheit (Germany) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid at the time of their publication.

About Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid have published 596 papers, which have received a total of 34.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 145 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 142 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 95 papers in Pollution, 88 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 171 papers in Ecology on the topics of Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (105 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (85 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (76 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (65 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (57 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (48 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (36 papers) and Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (35 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Environmental Chemistry (9.7k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (7.8k citations), Pollution (6.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (6.2k citations) and Ecology (11.6k citations). Authors at Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid collaborate with scholars in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Hydrobiologia, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Water Science & Technology, Chemosphere and Water Research. Some of Nederlands Instituut Publieke Veiligheid's most productive authors include Marten Scheffer, Hugo Coops, Marie-Louise Meijer, S. H. Hosper, Paul C. M. van Noort, A. Jan Hendriks, Erik Jeppesen, Gerard Cornelissen, Brian Moss and D.T. van der Molen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact