Office National des Forêts

15.5k citations
591 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Office National des Forêts

539 papers receiving 14.8k citations

Peers

Office National des Forêts
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 4.8k
  • Global and Planetary Change 4.8k
  • Ecological Modeling 941
  • Insect Science 2.0k
  • Ecology 4.2k
Replace Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés with:
Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés France
Silva France
Écologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes France
Interaction Sol Plante Atmosphère France
Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Germany
Physique et Physiologie Intégratives de l'Arbre en Environnement Fluctuant France
Dorset Green Technology Park United Kingdom
Natural England United Kingdom
Unité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire Prairies et Plantes Fourragères France
Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes France
Office National des Forêts relative to Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés France Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ecologie et Dynamique des Systèmes Anthropisés · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Office National des Forêts

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Office National des Forêts. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Office National des Forêts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Office National des Forêts more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Office National des Forêts

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Office National des Forêts at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Office National des Forêts at the time of their publication.

About Office National des Forêts

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Office National des Forêts have published 591 papers, which have received a total of 15.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 197 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 33 papers in Forestry, 170 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 87 papers in Insect Science and 58 papers in Soil Science on the topics of Forest ecology and management (113 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (90 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (78 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (56 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (53 papers), Forest Management and Policy (43 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (41 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (40 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nature and Landscape Conservation (4.8k citations), Global and Planetary Change (4.8k citations), Ecological Modeling (941 citations), Insect Science (2.0k citations) and Ecology (4.2k citations). Authors at Office National des Forêts collaborate with scholars in France, Italy and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Annals of Forest Science, Forest Ecology and Management, The Science of The Total Environment, Trees and Ecological Indicators. Some of Office National des Forêts's most productive authors include Erwin Ulrich, François Lebourgeois, Manuel Nicolas, Jean-Pierre Renaud, Sylvie Oddou‐Muratorio, Anne Probst, Sylvie Durrieu, Jean‐Luc Probst, Christophe Bouget and Laura Hernandez.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact