American Journal Experts (United States)

208 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

American Journal Experts (United States)
Comparison fields: 5 of 215
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 310
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 198
  • Communication 125
  • Gender Studies 165
  • Public Administration 61
Replace Public Knowledge with:
Public Knowledge United States
United States Postal Service United States
Carlow University United States
American Council on Education United States
Hogan Lovells (United States) United States
Magellan Health United States
Ohio University Lancaster United States
Pew Research Center United States
Concord University United States
Schulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas United States
American Journal Experts (United States) relative to Public Knowledge United States Public Knowledge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Public Knowledge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at American Journal Experts (United States)

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at American Journal Experts (United States). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at American Journal Experts (United States) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Journal Experts (United States) more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at American Journal Experts (United States)

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with American Journal Experts (United States) at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with American Journal Experts (United States) at the time of their publication.

About American Journal Experts (United States)

In recent decades, authors affiliated with American Journal Experts (United States) have published 299 papers, which have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1 paper in Medical Terminology, 1 paper in Research and Theory, 7 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 5 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 11 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management on the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (8 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (7 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (5 papers), Local Government Finance and Decentralization (5 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (5 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (310 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (198 citations), Communication (125 citations), Gender Studies (165 citations) and Public Administration (61 citations). Authors at American Journal Experts (United States) collaborate with scholars in United States, United Kingdom and Slovenia and have published in prestigious journals including Daedalus, American Journal of Therapeutics, The American Journal of Cardiology, Nursing Research and American Journal of Hypertension. Some of American Journal Experts (United States)'s most productive authors include John H. Laragh, Michael Nelson, Marc J. Hetherington, Donald S. Siegel, Wade W. Nobles, Jeremy C. Stein, Robert C. Borden, Richard Wolfe, Kevin M. McNeilly and Frederick A. Russ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact