United States Postal Service

8.6k citations
444 papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

United States Postal Service

353 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Peers

United States Postal Service
Comparison fields: 5 of 226
  • Inorganic Chemistry 1.1k
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.0k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 356
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 223
  • Pollution 360
Replace Somerset Medical Center with:
Somerset Medical Center United States
National Academy of Engineering United States
University of Pittsburgh at Bradford United States
Altria (United States) United States
Ontario Tobacco Research Unit Canada
King's College - Pennsylvania United States
Windsor Dermatology United States
Time Warner (United States) United States
Greensboro College United States
Cosmos Corporation (United States) United States
United States Postal Service relative to Somerset Medical Center United States Somerset Medical Center's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.6×
Somerset Medical Center · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at United States Postal Service

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United States Postal Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United States Postal Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United States Postal Service more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at United States Postal Service

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United States Postal Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United States Postal Service at the time of their publication.

About United States Postal Service

In recent decades, authors affiliated with United States Postal Service have published 444 papers, which have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 21 papers in Media Technology, 18 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 5 papers in Public Administration, 5 papers in Forestry and 15 papers in Management Science and Operations Research on the topics of ICT Impact and Policies (18 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (10 papers), Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization (10 papers), Growth and nutrition in plants (9 papers), Soil Management and Crop Yield (8 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (8 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (8 papers) and Merger and Competition Analysis (8 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Inorganic Chemistry (1.1k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.0k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (356 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (223 citations) and Pollution (360 citations). Authors at United States Postal Service collaborate with scholars in United States, Brazil and Japan and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Forensic Sciences, Science, Food Science of Animal Resources, Computers & Operations Research and SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. Some of United States Postal Service's most productive authors include G.J. Halder, Keith S. Murray, Cameron J. Kepert, J.D. Cashion, Boujemaa Moubaraki, Craig Zwerling, Deborah L. Whetzel, Jatinder N.D. Gupta, Michael A. McDaniel and Alan Baddeley.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact