Austin Independent School District

200 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Austin Independent School District
Comparison fields: 5 of 207
  • General Psychology 67
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 567
  • Education 1.2k
  • Social Psychology 580
  • Clinical Psychology 514
Replace Dallas Independent School District with:
Dallas Independent School District United States
Texas Wesleyan University United States
North American University United States
Victoria College United States
Arkansas Department of Education United States
Austin Community College United States
Montrose Center United States
Saint Joseph Seminary College United States
Houston Community College System United States
Louisiana Department of Education United States
Austin Independent School District relative to Dallas Independent School District United States Dallas Independent School District's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Dallas Independent School District · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Austin Independent School District

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Austin Independent School District. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Austin Independent School District with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Austin Independent School District more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Austin Independent School District

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Austin Independent School District at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Austin Independent School District at the time of their publication.

About Austin Independent School District

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Austin Independent School District have published 282 papers, which have received a total of 3.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1 paper in Medical Terminology, 4 papers in General Psychology, 34 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 59 papers in Education and 31 papers in Clinical Psychology on the topics of Early Childhood Education and Development (12 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (12 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (8 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (8 papers), Education and Technology Integration (7 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (7 papers) and Critical Race Theory in Education (6 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Psychology (67 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (567 citations), Education (1.2k citations), Social Psychology (580 citations) and Clinical Psychology (514 citations). Authors at Austin Independent School District collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Clinical Toxicology, Journal of School Psychology, The Counseling Psychologist and Learning Disability Quarterly. Some of Austin Independent School District's most productive authors include Melba J. T. Vásquez, Mathias B. Forrester, Kenneth S. Pope, Melba J. T. Vásquez, Linda Skrla, James Joseph Scheurich, Ronald Bradley Gillam, Anne Van Kleeck, David A. Erlandson and Thomas Oakland.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact