Wine Australia

882 papers receiving 22.2k citations

Peers

Wine Australia
Comparison fields: 5 of 221
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 1.6k
  • Food Science 6.0k
  • Plant Science 11.1k
  • Biochemistry 1.5k
  • Soil Science 898
Replace Animal, Food and Health Sciences with:
Animal, Food and Health Sciences Australia
Department of Primary Industries and Regions South Australia Australia
Poultry CRC Australia
ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture Australia
NSW Forestry Corporation Australia
ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology Australia
Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network Australia
Centre for Marine Socioecology Australia
Department of Water Australia
National Agricultural Research Institute Papua New Guinea
Wine Australia relative to Animal, Food and Health Sciences Australia Animal, Food and Health Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23.7×
Animal, Food and Health Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Wine Australia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Wine Australia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Wine Australia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wine Australia more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Wine Australia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Wine Australia at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Wine Australia at the time of their publication.

About Wine Australia

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Wine Australia have published 988 papers, which have received a total of 23.4k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 71 papers in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, 260 papers in Food Science, 411 papers in Plant Science, 41 papers in Biochemistry and 22 papers in Forestry on the topics of Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (214 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (210 papers), Wine Industry and Tourism (71 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (40 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (37 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (32 papers), Plant and animal studies (30 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (26 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (1.6k citations), Food Science (6.0k citations), Plant Science (11.1k citations), Biochemistry (1.5k citations) and Soil Science (898 citations). Authors at Wine Australia collaborate with scholars in Australia, United States and China and have published in prestigious journals including Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, Functional Plant Biology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Food Chemistry. Some of Wine Australia's most productive authors include Dennis H. Greer, Stephen D. Tyerman, Wendy J. Umberger, María L. Loureiro, Brent N. Kaiser, Maria M. Mendes-Pinto, Christopher Steel, Leigh M. Schmidtke, Natasha L. Teakle and Beverly S. Mühlhäusler.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact