FrontLine Service

55.6k citations
1.8k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

FrontLine Service

1.5k papers receiving 40.7k citations

Peers

FrontLine Service
Comparison fields: 5 of 229
  • Clinical Psychology 20.0k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 7.8k
  • General Health Professions 11.9k
  • Social Psychology 8.0k
  • Safety Research 3.2k
Replace VA Center for Clinical Management Research with:
VA Center for Clinical Management Research United States
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services United States
Westat (United States) United States
Health Resources and Services Administration United States
Counseling Center United States
Office of Education United States
American Institutes for Research United States
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry United States
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration United States
Families USA United States
FrontLine Service relative to VA Center for Clinical Management Research United States VA Center for Clinical Management Research's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
VA Center for Clinical Management Research · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at FrontLine Service

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at FrontLine Service. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at FrontLine Service with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites FrontLine Service more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at FrontLine Service

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with FrontLine Service at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with FrontLine Service at the time of their publication.

About FrontLine Service

In recent decades, authors affiliated with FrontLine Service have published 1.8k papers, which have received a total of 55.6k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 709 papers in Clinical Psychology, 297 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 425 papers in General Health Professions, 289 papers in Social Psychology and 47 papers in Applied Psychology on the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (206 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (182 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (169 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (111 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (91 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (88 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (76 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (69 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Clinical Psychology (20.0k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (7.8k citations), General Health Professions (11.9k citations), Social Psychology (8.0k citations) and Safety Research (3.2k citations). Authors at FrontLine Service collaborate with scholars in United States, Denmark and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, Psychiatric Services, Community Mental Health Journal, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research and Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. Some of FrontLine Service's most productive authors include Andrew Wall, Charles Glisson, Lonnie R. Snowden, John Landsverk, Toni L. Hembree-Kigin, Cheryl B. McNeil, Gregory A. Aarons, Philip Green, Randy Borum and Enola K. Proctor.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact